Okay, I need to create a professional and useful wiki document about "WikiWikiWeb" under the categories of Technology > Software > Open Source. Let me start by understanding what WikiWikiWeb is. From what I remember, it's one of the earliest wikis, created by Ward Cunningham in 1995. The name comes from the Hawaiian word for "quick," which makes sense because it's meant to be a fast way to create and edit web pages.

First, the structure: H1 title should be "WikiWikiWeb". Then an overview section. I need to explain what it is, its origin, key features, and significance. Next, sections with H2 and H3 headings. Maybe break down into History, Key Features, Technical Aspects, Impact on Open Source, etc.

For the history part, I should mention Ward Cunningham, the date (1995), the purpose of creating it as a tool for software developers to share knowledge quickly. Also, the name origin from Hawaiian. Then, how it evolved over time, maybe mentioning its influence on other wikis like Wikipedia.

Key Features: The simple syntax for linking pages, which is crucial. Maybe explain that users can create links by putting page names in double brackets. Also, the collaborative aspect, allowing multiple people to edit and contribute. Mention the use of a wiki engine, perhaps the original one written in Perl or another language.

Technical Aspects: How it works technically. The server-side processing, maybe using CGI scripts. The database structure—probably storing pages as plain text files. Security aspects? Maybe not too much since it's open source and collaborative, but some basic measures.

Impact on Open Source: How it contributed to the open-source movement by promoting collaboration and knowledge sharing. Mention other projects that were inspired by it. Also, its role in the development of web-based collaborative tools.

References and Related Documents: List some sources like Ward Cunningham's website, Wikipedia articles, maybe some academic papers or books about wiki technology.

I need to ensure the content is accurate. For example, confirming the exact year 1995, the original programming language (Perl), and the name origin. Also, check if there are any notable features that I might have missed, like version control or user permissions.

Avoid using too much jargon without explanation. If I mention "CGI scripts," I should briefly explain what they are. Make sure each section flows logically, with H2 headings for major sections and H3 for subsections. Use bullet points or lists where appropriate, maybe in the key features or technical aspects.

Check that the document is over 800 characters. Let me count: the example response provided earlier was around 1500 words, so I should be fine as long as each section is detailed enough.

Also, make sure to use markdown formatting correctly—H1 with #, H2 with ##, H3 with ###. Use code blocks for any technical terms or examples if needed. Avoid markdown in the thinking process but ensure it's applied properly in the final document.

Need to verify some facts: Was WikiWikiWeb the first wiki? Yes, according to most sources. Who created it? Ward Cunningham. What was its original purpose? To help software developers share knowledge quickly. The name "WikiWiki" comes from the Hawaiian word for quick. The initial implementation used a simple text-based system with links in double brackets.

Also, mention that it's an open-source project, which aligns with the category. Maybe talk about how it's been maintained over time, any forks or derivatives. Perhaps note that while not as widely known today as Wikipedia, it's foundational to the wiki concept.

In the impact section, discuss how it influenced other collaborative platforms and the spread of open-source culture. Maybe touch on its role in the development of web 2.0 concepts.

Make sure each section is concise but informative. Avoid redundancy. Use clear examples where possible. For instance, when explaining the linking syntax, provide an example like [[PageName]] creating a link to "PageName."

Check for any technical inaccuracies. For example, if I mention that it uses CGI, confirm that's correct. Also, note that while the original was simple, modern wikis have evolved with more features.

Finally, ensure the conclusion summarizes its significance and legacy in the open-source community.