Okay, I need to create a professional Korean wiki document about "버 구성 관리" the categories of 기, 소프트웨, and 자동화 Let me start by understanding the structure and requirements.

First, the title should be H1, so'll use # 서버 구성 관리. Then an introduction section explaining what server configuration management is. I should mention its importance in IT infrastructure, maybe touch on automation aspects the subcategory is 자동화.

Next, the detailed sections. The user mentioned using H2 and H3. Let me think of possible H2 sections. Maybe 구성 관리의 필요성, 주요 개념, 도구, 구성 관리 프로세스, 베스트 프랙티스, 참고 자료. Each of these can be H2 headers.

For each H2 section, I need H3 sub-sections. For example, under 구성 관리의 필요성, I can have 일관성 확보, 효율성 향상, 보안 강화. Under 주요 개념, maybe 상태 관리, 버전 관리, 인프라 코드.

In the 도구 section, I should list popular tools like Ansible, Puppet, Chef, SaltStack. For each, a brief description and maybe a code example if possible. Since code blocks are required for technical content, I can include a simple Ansible playbook example.

The 구성 관리 프로세스 section can break down into 단계: 요구 분석, 도구 선택, 레시피/플레이북 작성, 테스트, 적용, 모니터링. Each step as H3.

베스트 프랙티스 might include version control 사용, 모듈화, 테스트 자동화, 문서화.

I need to ensure that technical terms are explained. For example, when mentioning 인프라 코드, I should clarify that it's Infrastructure as Code (IaC), which allows managing and provisioning infrastructure through code.

Also, check the length to make sure it's over 800 characters. I'll expand each section with enough details. Use bullet points where appropriate. Maybe add a table comparing the tools (Ansible, Puppet, Chef) in terms of language, agentless, etc.

References section can have links to official sites of the tools and relevant books or articles.

Wait, the user wants 마크다운 형식. So tables, lists, code blocks. Let me structure the code example for Ansible. Use triple backticks with yaml syntax.

Also, ensure that the content is accurate. For instance, Puppet uses Ruby DSL, Chef uses Ruby, Ansible uses YAML. SaltStack uses Python. Agentless vs agents: Ansible is agentless, others require agents.

Make sure the introduction sets the context, explaining that server configuration management is about maintaining consistent server configurations across environments, especially important in large-scale and dynamic infrastructures.

In the 필요성 section, emphasize how manual management is error-prone and inefficient, hence the need for automation.

I should also mention benefits like faster deployment, reduced human errors, compliance and security through consistent policies.

Check for any missing sections. The user mentioned 참고 자료 or 관련 문서, so include those links at the end.

Avoid markdown in the thinking process, but in the final answer, structure it properly. Make sure each section flows logically, starting from introduction, necessity, concepts, tools, process, best practices, then references.

Double-check the terms in Korean. For example, "Infrastructure as Code" might be translated as "인프라 코드" or kept in English with explanation. Maybe use 인프라 코드 (IaC) to clarify.

Also, ensure that the code examples are simple and relevant. For instance, an Ansible playbook that installs Apache and starts the service.

Okay, putting it all together now. Start with the title, then introduction, each H2 section with H3 subsections, use lists and tables, include code examples, and end with references. Keep the language professional but accessible, explain terms when needed.